

A review of 'The Golden Antilles' by Timothy Severin

Naipaul's history of "nowhere"And yet, this book is brilliantly written, full of drama of torture and interminable trials, great and bitter ironies that lead to what Trinidad became (or didn't), all of it adding up to a sense of the passage of human life and striving. I loved this book: it is a fascinating rumination by a highly talented writer, a dark essay on futility and non-history.
It may seem obscure, but then, so is much of the Third WOrld's history. That is one of Naipaul's points. He is a true master.


Better than the movie!

"The Forty Niners" not a prize winner
The Glitter of The Gold Rush Removed

el peor libro de Wallace que he leido hasta ahora...

American Anthropology Association: Darkness "deeply flawed""We regard [Darkness in El Dorado] with profound ambivalence, finding the book deeply flawed, but nevertheless highlighting ethical issues that we must confront."
Visit the American Anthropology Association web site for the complete report.
Meticulous Character AssassinationTierney's argument is extensive and lengthy, clearly fueled by alternating rage and conviction. His knowledge of the area, its history, and the academic body surrounding the Yanomami is obvious. But, to my reading his narrative is poorly organized, even rambling. His detailed attacks against Chagnon, Neel, and others continue throughout the book, more or less chronologically, with detailed analyses and the debunking/disproving of Chagnon's studies and products continuing right to the very last paragraph on the very last page. It seems to me, however, that the discussion of the US Atomic Energy Commission's Project Sunshine, the radioactive injection programs, the mysterious bone collection program, the encroachment of miners and other agents of plunder into Yanomami areas, and the tales of official corruption all would serve to be the bookends, the hard bands around a core of clinical and precise dissection of Chagnon, both personally and professionally. But such was not the case.
There are a great many issues going on here, and Tierney's need to address them all dilutes his overall work.... Tierney attacks constantly, without letting up, only rarely giving ground. To his credit, he does point out valid observations At the same time, he goes after the corrupt politicians and their cohorts, as well as the US Atomic Energy Commission, journalists, and any number of other individuals and organizations which he asserts have had impacts-all of them negative--upon the Yanomami. Many of these side stories are highly intriguing, worthy of additional research and publication, specifically the AEC's Project Sunshine and the bone collection program.
Reading the book gave me some insight of my own. I'd argue that a better subtitle to the book would be "How Vanity and Commerce Devastated the Amazon." From the information provided here, what is clearly driving the academic exaggerations and falsifications, and the increasing, destructive contact with the Yanomami is the quest for personal glory and/or greed. The scientists saw and still see Yanomamiland as a massive laboratory in which to make a global reputation, the locals (politicians and entrepreneurs) see it as a resource-rich region for exploitation, and the journalists regard the area as a made-for-publication, story-rich environment, full of newspaper-selling, viewer-inducing drama. Unfortunately, all of this is true. What comes through clearly is that the Yanomami are absolutely powerless, ultimately doomed, unable to even conceive of let alone competently oppose the forces conspiring constantly to exploit them.
In conclusion, the book serves three positive, educational purposes. First, it provides a detailed and accurate, albeit distorted slightly by Tierney's passion, history of the discovery and exploitation of the Yanomami. Second, it provides a cautionary tale on the nature of exploration and discovery, a real-world anthropological application of the Heisenberg Principle. And third, despite its rambling, unfocused message, it offers a textbook method for a point-by-point, meticulous refutation and indictment of apparently false ...scientific research. Tierney does not stoop to name-calling or insults; he retains the high ground yet ruthlessly, incessantly picks apart and destroys decades of Chagnon's and others' work, a lifetime of apparently wasted and falsified effort, all in the name of vanity.
'science' over humanity"all of Chagnon's work is taken in vain." so are a lot of peoples livlihoods so he gets his paycheck. you can balance what you think its more important... a man coming back to his roots to observe for the rest of us or letting the people live autonomously.


total waste of time
Masters of All That They Surveyed
The View From the Non-Expert


While some of the stories in this book are quite colourful and full of dashing, adventurous and romantic tales of the buccaneers and pirates of that time I suspect, after having read this book, that the author relied to much on a book called 'The History of the Bucaniers' by Alexander Oliver Oexmelin which is well known for being of dubious quality when it comes to plain historical fact. In this way I feel the author himself has been taken in by the romanticism of the great tales of the carribean during its buccaneering heyday and thus lost his objectivity. This is however, only a minor flaw in what is otherwise a great book.
Overall I give it 8/10, losing out only because of the previously mentioned lack of objectivty and the omitance of a great deal of other events of that time.
I got this book from the library and I am unable to find it through retail so if you find it please contact me.
Mark Andrews(mra@mistral.co.uk)